Tom Murphy says he has a solution to y2k, at least for COBOL. Well, a solution for half the code. Which half? He doesn't say.
It would save industry billions of dollars. That's what he says. Carl Sagan said it best: billions and billions.
Ironic that the solution would come from a guy named Murphy.
* * * * * * * * *
Iím an engineer who runs a small software company. In the last 20 years Iíve written lots of the kind of software that is going to break on January 1, 2000. I have many former customers - in some cases 15 years have passed - who will be out of luck when the millennium rolls in. So I have worried over this problem a good deal, as you might imagine. Yes, it's a problem. But there are solutions. And one solution is to get the same guys selling Y2K consulting services, notably the computer manufacturers like IBM, to place a small strategically placed "fix" into their operating systems. This fix would solve at least half of the problem.
A hefty percentage of the code that is going to break on Jan 1, 2000 is IBM mainframe COBOL software. Yet IBM could change its ES/390 and AS/400 operating system software to let users designate a program as being "year 2000 deficient"; when running these programs, the operating system could then automatically correct many - if not the vast majority of - date sorting and size errors by handling dates after Jan 1, 2000 as if there were additional decades in the twentieth century (e.g. the 70s, the 80s, the 90s, the A0s, the B0s, etc.). If you want the technical details,
How much code would be fixed? From my experience, the percentage would be quite high. In my kind of applications, the fix could be a complete remedy! Overall, I have to believe at least half of the errors would disappear. Yeah, the screens and printouts might have some funny looking or missing characters, though with a little more work the computer manufacturers could probably fix even that; or, some simple conventions could be used, or some minor rewrites could be made to key screen/print programs. Industry would wind up saving hundreds of billions, and the companies who simply canít afford to rewrite all their software would avert a needless upheaval.
My fix is a handful of relatively simple changes to the operating system. Based on 20 years of programming IBM mainframes, I say it can be done. And I propose the fix will work in one form or another on most platforms that run COBOL.
So, the Year 2000 Problem need not be as bad as the computer manufacturers make it out to be. Especially if these same guys would spend a little less time crying about how bad it is and a little more time fixing their products to handle it.